Saturday, July 13, 2019

“My Name is Bosch and I'm a Recovered Muslim”

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

My Name is Bosch and I'm a Recovered Muslim 

[Mirror] My name is Bosch and I'm a recovered Muslim. That is, if Muslims don’t kill me for leaving Islam, which it requires them to do. That’s just one of the reasons I’ve been writing and drawing against Islam and its Jihad for a number of years now. But fortunately for us, Islam hasn’t been able to make every Muslim its slave, just as Nazism wasn’t able to turn every German into a Nazi. So there is Islam and there are Muslims. Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t.

But that doesn’t mean we should consider these reluctant Muslims allies against Jihad. I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam. The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover. They force us to play a game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. And their indifference about the evil being committed in the name of their religion is a big reason why their reputation is where it is. In the toilet. 

So while I understand that most Muslims are not at war with us, they’ve proven in their silence and inaction against jihad that they’re not on our side either, and there’s nothing we can say or do to change that. We just have to finally accept it and stop expecting them to come around, while doing our best to kill those who are trying to kill us.

Another problem with Muslims who aren’t very Muslim is that they lead some among us to conclude that they must be practicing a more enlightened form of Islam. They’re not. They’re “practicing” life in non-Muslim countries, where they are free to live as they choose. But their “Islam” is not the Islam. There’s no separate ideology apart from Islam that’s being practiced by these Muslims in name only, there’s no such thing as “Western Islam”.

Non-observant Muslims are not our problem, but neither are they the solution to our problem. Our problem is Islam and its most consistent practitioners. There is nothing in Islam that stays the hand of Muslims who want to kill non-Muslims. If an individual Muslim is personally peaceful, it’s not because of Islam, it’s because of his individual choice, which is why I often say that your average Muslim is morally superior to Mohammad, to their own religion. The very rare Muslim who helps us against Jihad is acting against his religion, but that doesn’t stop some among us from thinking that his existence somehow means that he represents more than himself.

The only reason we’re talking about Islam is because it doesn’t mean peace. Islam wasn’t hijacked by a “small minority of extremists” on 9/11, it was hijacked by a very small minority of moderates whose embarrassment in being associated with such an immoderate religion leads them to engage in moderate truth telling about it, proving their irrelevance as allies.

In addition to these politically active moderates, when you see well-assimilated Muslims in the West, you’re not seeing Islam in action, you’re seeing individuals living up to the old adage, when in Rome, do as the Romans do. They’re essentially post-Islamic Muslims who have rejected Islamic values and have embraced Western ones. But since the process of their assimilation was implicit – as it happened naturally by their exposure to Western, i.e., pro-life, values – both Muslims and non-Muslims alike prefer to generously give Islam some credit for it. But a good Muslim, by our standards is a bad Muslim by Islamic standards. Objectively good human beings, who identify themselves as Muslim, give Islam a good face, one far better than it deserves. This only gives us a false impression about what it is we’re facing, with just another excuse not to face it. And this leads to our acceptance into our culture of stealth jihadists who have figured out how to say what we want to hear, while they scheme behind the scenes to further Islamize the West.

In the name of distinguishing the enemy from Muslims who mean us no harm, far too many Western commentators have avoided using the name “Islam” for the enemy’s ideology, and instead have decided to create their very own terms for the threat we’re facing, terms that are alien to the enemy. Terms such as:

Islamic Fundamentalism.
Islamic Extremism.
Totalitarian Islam.
Islamofascism.
Islamonazism.
Political Islam.
Bin Ladenism.
Radical Islam.
Militant Islam.
Islamism.
Jihadism.

We didn’t use terms such as “Radical Nazism”, “Extremist Shinto” and “Militant Communism” in the past. “Militant Islam”, Political Islam”, etc., are redundant terms. Our pretending otherwise has proven disastrous. Thousands of American lives, both civilian and military, have been sacrificed because of policies predicated on the myth that “Islam means peace.” We didn’t try to reform Shinto or Nazism during World War II; the major changes in those cultures took place only after we thoroughly de-militarized them.
And it’s no accident that Western analysts of Islam who are most informed about Islam are also most critical of it, while those least informed are least critical. But then there are those who, in their study of Islam, have become so enamored with their subject that, instead of sticking to what Islam is, they often write about what it isn’t, what they hope it might be. They seem preoccupied with doing their part to save Islam from those who have allegedly corrupted it.

The Muslim world is where the true meaning of Islam can be found in practice. Islam – not any alleged deviant form of it – means misogyny, censorship, anti-Semitism, homophobia, wife-beatings, beheadings, honor killings, pedophilia/“child marriages”, murdering infidels, etc. This is evil, and Islam sanctions every bit of it, but we’ve been told that we must respect “one of the world’s great religions” because it’s a religion. Following 9/11, the only thing George W. Bush knew about Islam was that it was a religion, and that apparently was a good enough reason for him to exonerate it as he did. And his advisor on Islam, David Forte, told Bush exactly what he wanted to hear, that “Nothing this evil could come from religion.” But 9/11 did come from a religion. Whatever else 9/11 was, it was an act of faith.

And Bush saying “Islam is peace” shortly after 9/11 gave the enemy a gift they couldn’t have foreseen. Here was the one man who was charged to defend America from their attack and here he was defending the very ideology that motivated the attackers. Honesty is the best policy in general, and when it comes to war, it’s a moral imperative to find out the truth, to tell the truth and to act on the truth, no matter what sacred cow is killed in the process. And so a big part of why nearly 3,000 victims of jihad on 9/11 haven’t been avenged is because of respect for religion, even for a religion that calls for our destruction.

Muslims who really care about Islam are part of an organized effort to spread Islam, and I sometimes refer to this collective effort by Muslims as “Organized Islam.” No matter the means involved, Muslims working towards a more Islamic world want the same thing the jihadists want. This organized effort includes Mosques, Muslim organizations, Muslim individuals writing books, blog posts, etc. And they all invariably engage in anti-Western, Anti-Israeli propaganda, at the very least.

I often hear that we should be working with the Muslim world. Working towards what? As Ayn Rand writes, “In any collaboration between two men (or two groups) who hold different basic principles, it is the more evil or irrational one who wins.” Any time we spend “working” with a culture that calls for our destruction, we are working towards our own destruction, consciously or not.

While it’s true that jihadists don’t represent most Muslims, they do represent Islam. But then why don’t most Muslims engage in jihad? Like in any culture, heroes are a small minority, and that goes for Islamic culture as well. The jihadists are Islam’s heroes; they are the ones most dedicated to following Allah’s commands and they’re celebrated in the Muslim world for it. They are also the only ones to whom Islam guarantees paradise. And their rarity was made even clearer when we learned that only the pilots of 9/11 knew it was a suicide mission. Our enemy knows that it’s tough to get even hardcore Muslims to sacrifice their lives for Islam, but they don’t want us to know that. Just as they don’t want us to know that behind their boast that they love death is the fact that they hate life.

And while Muslims who blow themselves up in order to kill non-Muslims are a small minority, Muslims who would explicitly condemn them are an even smaller minority. And while I think that Muslims are mere sheep to their Jihadist wolves, there are also too many Muslim cheerleaders for jihad. How many Muslims celebrated 9/11? Far too many. Even in my own lax Muslim upbringing in America, there was an omnipresent anti-Semitism and misogyny. Some members of my family admired Adolph Hitler, who I refer to as “Islam’s Favorite Infidel.” Regarding misogyny, the birth of a girl became a day of mourning for Muslim women in my family; they understood the suffering this girl would endure under Islam, even in America.

Though we say we’ve been at war for over ten years, we haven’t even begun to fight the war the way we should be fighting it. And those calling for a change within Islam during this war would be surprised at how much Islam can be changed through an honest war on our behalf. You can’t make a violent religion like Islam non-violent by argument, only by greater retaliatory force against state sponsors of jihad terrorism.

The future of Islam and the well-being of Muslims is said to be of importance to us. Post – 9/11, the defense of our culture, our values, our very lives has been optional, but our defense of Islam has been absolute. It began with Bush’s “Islam is peace” and it continues with Obama, who said in his Submission Speech in Egypt in 2009, in front of members of The Muslim Brotherhood, “I consider it part of my responsibility as president of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.” If only he felt the same about America.

We can’t be both for Islam and for ourselves. This enemy is fully on their own side and fully against us and they’ve made themselves believe that they’re the good guys and that we’re the bad guys, and our actions have done nothing but turn their hatred of us into an ever-deepening contempt. Before we see the enemy for what it is, we need to see ourselves for what we are. Only then can we, with full moral conviction, make them pay for what they’ve done and move us towards victory.

Our problem is not “Islamophobia”, but Islamophilia. It is this uncritical, uninformed, absolute defense of Islam by Western elites after 9/11 that I refer to as Islamgate. It’s a scandal for the ages that few involved would ever admit to being part of.

I care about the truth. I care about Western Civilization. I care about myself, my loved ones and my friends. I care about Iife. And that’s why I don’t care about Islam.

Our altruistic concern for the future and well being of the Muslim world has come at the expense of American lives and treasure. We’ve placed the well being of “The Muslim World” above our own self-defense. We’ve placed today’s Big Lie, “Islam means peace”, above the truth we need to act on. We’ve placed the lives of Muslim civilians above the lives of our soldiers, placing them in absolutely unnecessary danger in order to protect innocent (or even guilty) civilians. Our Rules of Engagement might as well be renamed the Golden Rules of Engagement, as our soldiers have been forced to treat the enemy the way we’d like to be treated. And the enemy takes full advantage of that, as they do of all of the policies our morally vain politicians have concocted. We need to shift the focus onto our own well-being at the enemy’s expense for a change.

We’ve tried everything since 9/11 except real war. War is the answer to Jihad.

So who cares about Islam? Muslims, Jihadists, Islamophiles, Leftists who naturally side with anti-American ideologies, guilt-ridden fellow travelers who think America is usually in the wrong, and religionists who believe any religion is better than none. But since Leftists and Islamophiles usually know very little about Islam, who truly cares about Islam? Those who are at war with us.

In the end, I care about Islam and the Muslim world as much as the Muslim world cares about America and the West. This is war. We can’t be on both sides. I’m not rooting for Islam or the Muslim world.

I’m rooting for us.



I wrote this piece in December 2011 and my working title for it was "Who Cares About Islam?". It became my most popular article on Islam and Jihad, published as Non-Muslim Muslims and the Jihad Against the West- which I wrote for Front Page Magazine in December, 2011: 

Bosch Fawstin is an Eisner Award nominated cartoonist currently working on a graphic novel, The Infidel, of which the first three chapters are now available as digital comics. Bosch’s first graphic novel is Table for One. He is also the author of ProPiganda: Drawing the Line Against Jihad, a companion to The Infidel, and the 1st print appearance of Pigman.

UPDATEHere's the audio version of my article above. 

27 comments:

  1. Bosch what do you make of this:

    http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/the-origins-of-islamic-law.html

    apparently some think that Islamic Law is not a problem from that link above.

    I also give you exhibit B

    "All laws on earth originated from some religion. Everything from Hamurabi to Buddha to the ten commandments to Quran to the book of Mormons. Muhammad's statue is engraved outside the US Supreme Court.

    Find me one legal system where some people started writing laws from scratch?

    This doesn't mean that laws are copied and applied verbatim. Laws morph and change according to what the people want them to be. Like Sharia law evolved for 1000 years then stopped because of the collapse of their civilization."
    Reply
    Replies
    1. Justice & law as secular concepts find their origin in Ancient Greek, a turning point best dramatized in The Eumenides (who begin as The Furies), Sophocles' great opera (music now lost).

      The problem with the world today is that most people are content to sit by idly as Eumenides revert to their former, inarticulate, 'furious' state.
  2. I really like this piece. I hope you don't mind that I post part of it on my blog (lifeordeathpolitics.wordpress.com) with a link to the whole article.

    I was referenced to this piece from "don't let it go". I'm starting from the beginning of this podcast and working my way to the present.
    Reply
  3. Uh, you might want to google "Shinto" before you suggest that "Extremist Shinto" is redundant and imply there's some sort of violence inherent in it. You sound like a loon.
    Reply
    Replies
    1. BalthCat - you might want to make your own case instead of dishonestly demanding that someone else make your case for you.
  4. Bosch - can we publish your article and a few of your pictures in a weekly online satirical magazine @ViveCharIie ?

    One of our contributors is Robert Spencer.

    https://www.joomag.com/magazine/vive-charlie-issue-6/0392226001424803374
    Reply
    Replies
    1. Sure, Joe, thanks
  5. No, no, I am Bosch Fawstin.
    Reply
  6. I live in Alabama where we can defend ourselves. I swab all my ammo with bacon. It's easy, when you open a box just wipe down the lead (or in my case, steel jackets). It's a natural lube and helps the bullet slide up the auto load ramp. We all need to do this.
    Reply
    Replies
    1. Makes for that much more of a reliable extraction of the spent casing as well. Definitely a great plan, John.
  7. Good piece, but you really should proofread and correct the many typos.
    Reply
    Replies

    1. Thanks, but since you're the only person who has mentioned any typos, you really should point them out specifically, so I can correct the "many" typos.
    2. I think you are either mistaking American spellings as incorrect or you are just being very itchy.This is an honest brave & well-written piece
  8. This was a great blog. I already knew everything in it. I'm incensed by it all though and don't have the patience to write such a well thought out, helpful plea to humanity. You do, and for that I am thankful and so should everyone else who reads it and learns from it. Peace and God Bless you.
    Reply
  9. GREAT piece, logical and spot on. Keep up the good work, and don't sweat the anal types who read to prove their superior use of the dictionary and Strunk and White rather than their appreciation for content.  
    Reply
  10. He's doing you a favor. There are a lot of typos. Just have someone with fresh eyes look it over for you.
    Reply
    Replies
    1. Again, name one, or a handful.
  11. I didn't notice a single typo in the first reading--but on the second, I looked for them; have found one at the end of the second paragraph, where 'tiolet' should be 'toilet.' It's a very well written article generally. If I see anything else, I'll let you know.
    Reply
    Replies
    1. I appreciate that.
  12. nice article about islam i am waiting for your next post
    Wazifa for job
    Nazra tul Quran Course
    Reply
  13. Wow, western democracy is crumbling around our ears and people are worrying about typos. Says it all. No wonder islam currently has the upper hand. I wonder if typos are punishable by death under Sharia? That would be REAL progress for mankind. Great piece Bosch. I'm now following you on You Tube and doing what I can to support warriors for freedom like yourself, including Jamie Glazov, Pamela Geller, Philip Haney, Wafa Sultan, Brigitte Gabriel, Frank Gaffney, Robert Spencer, Sam Harris, Harry Richardson et al by purchasing books amd spreading the word. We owe you all a great debt. Thank you.
    Reply
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Gregory, I appreciate that.
  14. For a better perspective maybe you should look into the Thirty Years War. Christians were extremists,terrorists,etc and did not stop being such until the end of a long and painfully bloody conflict that involved most of Europe. What is happening in the Islamic world is very similar and will not end until exhaustion sets in among them. 
    Reply
    Replies
    1. You either forgot or didn't want fo mention that the Jihads were going on for Hundreds of years before the Crusades, and were the catalyst for them. The Crusades lasted for 200, and the Jihads rage on for 1,400 years.,
  15. I like your point about a good Muslim to us not being a good Muslim according to Islam.

    I understand that situation is unique, because of the violence and all that.

    I think, though, that the general principle can apply to other things.

    What I see as a good Christian might NOT be what's considered a good Christian in Christianity. I like Christians who are pro-choice, supportive of gay rights, and don't believe I'm going to hell. But is that truly supported by the Bible and other ancient Christian teachings? 

    I'm a very bad Jew which probably makes me more acceptable in the general population.

    I'm a very bad vegetarian who eats gelatin and loves the smell of bacon. I think these kind of things make me more tolerable in the general community, but I'd probably seen as a heretic by many other vegetarians. 

    Back to religions...I think most of them are full of a lot of shit, but they also have some good. But to be safe and peaceful, they have to let go of a lot of stuff, including what's in the ancient texts and including some longstanding traditions.

    I don't think Islam is a religion of peace with a few bad apples as some people believe. But I do think there are some good things about the religion, and I hope it can evolve into something better. In the same ways, I think Christianity, Judaism, etc. can evolve into better things. 
    Reply
  16. Hi Bosch, your prose is some of the best most logical I have read on Islam!

    Dina, word to the wise, the Judeo-Christian religions have the golden rule, Islam does not.

    Martin
    Reply


Friday, July 5, 2019

Foreign Agents Operating in America: CAIR, NIAC, etc.

Why are organizations and individuals that represent foreign agents allowed to operate on US Soil?  For most people that are familiar with CAIR or NIAC (among others), they instantly recognize the Hamas and Islamic Republic Money, Ideology, Compromise and Ego or Extortion (MICE).

During the Obama Administration, the Holy Land Foundation trial was shut down and CAIR only designated as an Un-indicted Co-Conspirator in the HLF case.  However, that does not mean they were not guilty of sending money and laundering it to thier friends at Hamas and the Palestinian Intifada.  

This is why it is of utmost significance to uproot Hamas in America along with every organization affiliated with it. Which brings us to the story of President Trump The Great of America wanting to designate, the already designated globally as a terror organization, the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) as a Terrorist Organization.  The Ikhwan actually works with Hamas and Hezbullah (Iran) in order to attack Western targets through various means.  One of the biggest pushes they have lately is getting as many Ikhwani allied politicians into the US Government as well as various Agencies and Corporations.  CAIR is pushing to have 5000 new Islamists elected to Government posts. 

As soon as the Ikhwan aka Muslim Brotherhood is designated as a Terrorist Organization, loved by Muhammad Elibiary that helped establish the Irving, Texas Sharia Court aka "Mediation Council" and the stooge 'Ayman' who on his youtube video tried to show it off as a normal mediation establishment, will actually help the US Government and Law Enforcement to shut down CAIR, NIAC, and other foreign agent organizations.  These organizations need to register as foreign agents in America, however they don't.  They are helped by thier allies in the DNC, such as Dennis Kucinich here locally that was praying with CAIR affiliates at the local Persian Kabab joint called Jeddo Kabab.  The irony is that Jeddo Kabab's owner is not an Islamist and is the diametric opposite of an Islamist. 

Regardless, Trump needs to make sure these organizations are shut down and thier subversive influence erased from America before we become the Islamic Republic of America. 

Friday, March 29, 2019

Political Islamists: The True Neo-Neo Nazis

“The Nazis understood the relationship between Islam and anti-Semitism so well that they tried to exploit it for their agenda of extermination. Mohammed Amin al-Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem who had been agitating against Jews for a quarter of a century, broadcast anti-Semitic messages from Berlin with Hitler's support from 1941 until the end of World War II. Al-Husseini -- a close ally of the Muslim Brotherhood's founder, Hassan al-Banna, who admired Hitler -- told Arabs in the British Mandate of Palestine to "kill the Jews wherever you find them."

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/03/the_true_neonazis.html

Monday, March 25, 2019

NO COLLUSION: President Donald Trump The Great of America

Considering that two years were wasted as well as $35 to $45 MILLION DOLLARS to attack President Trump the Great of The United States of America...Who is responsible for this ATTEMPTED COUP?

Who will be prosecuted at the Democratic Part, CAIR, and thier Islamist and Marxist Allies?

The FBI needs a new J Edgar Hoover to pursue Marxism, Communism and Islamism that has been infiltrating our corporations, government, and law enforcement. 

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

The Return of Ancient Prejudices

Mirror:
The Return of Ancient Prejudices


By Victor Davis Hanson| February 6th, 2019

In the latter half of the 19th century and early in the 20th century, as Catholic immigrants poured in from Ireland and eastern Europe, an anti-Catholic wave spread over a mostly Protestant United States. The majority slur then was that Catholic newcomers’ first loyalty would be to “Rome,” not the U.S.
Anti-Semitism grew even more deeply rooted, marked by Ivy League quotas on Jewish applicants and exclusionary clauses against Jews in clubs and neighborhoods. It was no accident that the Ku Klux Klan often targeted Catholics and Jews as well as African-Americans.

ADVERTISING


In the late 19th century, with the influx of Japanese and Chinese immigrants arose the “yellow peril” scare, a racist distrust of supposedly workaholic automatons and unassimilable immigrants whose first loyalty was to their close-knit Asian communities and homelands, not the U.S.
Most of these injustices grew from both original prejudices (as evidenced by slavery) and fears of demographic change. An original population that was mostly British, Protestant and white gradually was augmented by people who were not northern European, often Catholic and increasingly non-white.
The stereotyped hatreds were battled by the melting-pot forces of assimilation, integration and intermarriage. Civil rights legislation and broad education programs gradually convinced the country to judge all Americans on the content of their characters rather than the color of their skins or their religious beliefs. And over the last half-century, the effort to end institutional bias against African-Americans largely succeeded.

But recently, other ancient prejudices have been insidiously returning. And this time, the bias is more subtle, and it can be harder to address than traditional racism against non-white populations. The new venom, for example, is often spread by left-wing groups that claim victim status themselves and thus, by their logic, should not be seen as victimizers.
Progressive senators such as Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) have attacked judicial nominees on grounds that they are Catholic, apparently because the Catholic Church and its affiliates officially disprove of abortion and gay marriage.
Feinstein complained that one appeals court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, was a dubious choice because “the dogma lives loudly within you.” Hirono claimed that judicial nominee Brian Buescher was suspect because the Knights of Columbus held “extreme positions.” Harris whined that the public-service Catholic organization was an “all-male society comprised primarily of Catholic men.”

Recently, a number of newly elected congressional representatives—Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Rashida Tlaib—have voiced virulent anti-Israel bias that came off as anti-Semitic. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) compared Jewish settlers on the West Bank to “termites.” CNN pundit Marc Lamont Hill (who has since been fired) parroted the Hamas eliminationist slogan “Palestine from the river to the sea,” which is code for the destruction of the Jewish state.
Universities feel free to discriminate against Asian-Americans because their hard work and excellent preparation often leads to superb grades, test scores and application credentials. In other words, Asian-Americans supposedly distort progressive agendas of proportional representation, disparate impact and diversity by overachieving and being overqualified—purportedly robbing spots from other minority applicants.
Asian-American achievement also disproves the old canard that prejudice makes it impossible to find parity in the United States.
What is behind the rebirth of these old prejudices? In short, new, evolving prejudices.
First, America seemingly no longer believes in striving to achieve a gender-blind, racially and religiously mixed society, but instead is becoming a nation in which tribal identity trumps all other considerations.
Second, such tribal identities are not considered to be equal. Doctrinaire identity politics is predicated on distancing itself from white males, Christians and other groups who traditionally have achieved professional success and therefore enjoyed inordinate “privilege.”
Third, purported victims insist that they themselves cannot be victimizers. So, they are freer to discriminate and stereotype to advance their careers or political interests on the basis of anything they find antithetical to their own ideologies.
The Democratic senators who questioned the morality of judicial nominees’ religion likely would not treat a Muslim nominee in the same manner—although one could make the argument that contemporary Islam has had as many or more problems with gender equity than Western Catholicism has.
Calling any other ethnic group other than Jews “termites” might have earned Rep. Johnson congressional censure. And if professional football and basketball franchises turned away talented but “over-represented” African-American athletes to ensure greater diversity in the same manner that universities now systematically discriminate against Asian-Americans, there would be a national outcry.
What once helped to diminish ancient prejudices was the American creed that no one had a right to discriminate against fellow citizens on the basis of race, gender, class or religion.
And what fuels the return of American bias is the new idea that citizens can disparage or discriminate against other groups if they claim victim status and do so for purportedly noble purposes.
The more attitudes and agendas may change, the more they stay the same.
Photo Credit: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call
(C) 2019 TRIBUNE CONTENT AGENCY, LLC.



About the Author: Victor Davis Hanson

Victor Davis Hanson is an American military historian, columnist, former classics professor, and scholar of ancient warfare. He was a professor of classics at California State University, Fresno, and is currently the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004. Hanson was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2007 by President George W. Bush. Hanson is also a farmer (growing raisin grapes on a family farm in Selma, California) and a critic of social trends related to farming and agrarianism. He is the author most recently of The Second World Wars: How the First Global Conflict was Fought and Won (Basic Books).