Monday, February 20, 2017

Former Sunni Scholar: Worst Creatures in Islam

This is somebody I had the chance to talk to when he was Sunni.  He used to debate me about my Sufi-Shia faith, which is a Non-Political and Non-Sharia faith.  Because of his staunch Anti-Shia view based on his Sunni beliefs, he ended up unfriending me on Facebook.

However ,now he has fortunately left the Salafist or Sunni Fundamentalist sect and seems to have become Christian again, which is great.  I would rather see people stay Christians than become Salafists who hate America.

I hope he has a great life and that he feels better not having to deal with the insanity which is Fundamentalist Islam.  He makes great points in this video and I recommend watching it all the way to the end...he points out how Radical Islam makes you enemies not just with your own country, but also with your own family.

Former extremist: 'I was living dual lives'

During my time as an Executive Director for CAIR Columbus, there was the Rifqa Bary Controversy...during that time period, this organization 'Revolution Muslim' being a Wahabist Organization supporting Al-Qaeda attacked us for saying that there was no death for apostasy...they said we were lying.  Now, both of the main people from this organization seem to have left Wahabism or Islamic Extremism aka Radical Islam / Political Islam.  This is a great example of how people can become 'De-Radicalized'.   He comes from the same time period that I had gotten into Sunni Islam and some of the same experiences made me leave it.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

HONEYTRAP SPIES: Hijabi or Hijab-less Female Islamist Spies and Subversives

During my time learning about people on Social Media, I have come to a conclusion that there are people living in places like San Francisco, New York, Seattle, Portland, etc. that are in reality the children of the Islamist Mullahs in various countries who have joined together due to their common Socialist beliefs that match the Islamist ideals.

These Islamist Honeytrap Spies job is basically to use the Leftists in America as a tool to push forward their parents and families agendas in Sharia controlled countries.  They spend endless hours on social media and in politics in order to help push down any resistance by making fun of anybody that opposes them.

In order to stop this type of subversive espionage by these Female Honeytrap Agents, we need to first identify who they are by various red flags.  Such as...when they seem to be hating on Western Leaders and Policies while they say nothing bad about the dictators, tyrants and murderers in their countries of origin.  The best way to pull these Honeytrap Spies out of their 'Glamour' veneer is to keep probing them with questions and maybe even troll them if necessary to see what are their reactions.

Many such Islamist Women with or without Hijab are working together to push forward their dreams of a Socialist world under a Caliphate.  As Americans we have to be vigilant and report people like this to the authorities when we find them.

Read more:

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Sweden's Feminist Government Mingles with Islamism

So, the so called 'First Feminist Government' in the world...Sweden goes to Iran and all it's members wear Hijabs, Chadors, and Longcoats in deference to Iran's Islamic regime.  So, apparently these new feminists respect other tyrants who want to rule over others.  In Iran it's Patriarchal Hegemony, in Sweden it's Matriarchal, however both have oppressive systems in place against the other sex.  I don't think that was the coal of the original feminists when they came out with the idea.

This is just another example of how the Left is in bed with Globalists and Islamists and do not care about real Civil Rights or Freedoms.  I bet Linda Sarsour is on their top list of people to hang out with if they ever visited the USA.  The Islamo-Leftist Alliance could not be any more crystal clear than Sweden's visit to Iran.  

Monday, February 13, 2017

The Trump Effect? Playboy: Nude is Back...Cooper Hefner

With Trump, more Freedom is back...! "Cooper Hefner, the magazine's chief creative officer and son of founder Hugh Hefner, tweeted the news on Monday saying it was "a mistake" to remove nudes from the magazine. The news comes a year after Playboy debuted its first issue without nude photos."

So, this brings into question the Hijabi article we witnessed a while back, will Hijabi or Niqabi Muslim Women feature in Playboy now that it's Nude again?

Cybersecurity and Outsourcing: An Oxymoron

During my 23 years experience working as a Sr. Business Analyst for various corporations, one thing struck me lately that should be on the mind of every CEO and CIO of every American corporation and government institution...The Outsourced Cybersecurity Professional.  Why would anybody that is serious about Cybersecurity hire a foreign national?  What kind of sense does that make?

The answer of course is that it does not make any sense, however it does make money sense.  I hear from many corporate managers that they 'can't get local help' when it comes to high level IT help.  Well, the reality is that we have literally hundreds of thousands of unemployed American IT professionals, however the IT recruiters will of course offer the half price foreign workers first.

That being the case, these managers need to know that they are creating massive security risks for their companies by hiring people with no loyalties to America or it's corcporations or government institutions.  This cheaper worker practice should be a ZERO TOLERANCE policy for companies and hiring managers.  By default hiring people like this is a security breach to begin with.

H1B workers should never be hired for Risk, Cybersecurity or Identity and Access Management positions.  The US Government should be able to prosecute companies that do these 'human security' violations.  

CAIR, MPAC, ISNA Have Failed American Muslims: Police, FBI investigate vandalism at Columbus mosque

The Police and FBI always do their job well. Sad how CAIR scares the Muslim community from talking to the FBI. However this shows how little the community has had acceptance by the 70 percent majority of America, who has been alienated by so called American Muslim orgs such as CAIR that virtually does no outreach to the 70 percent majority of Republican Christians in America. By joining forces with the Left, which is ironic because most Muslims are morally conservative, they have alienated both Christians and Muslims who don't agree with the Left's immorality. Until Muslims do real outreach to the right in America, I expect to see more, not less of this sort of unfortunate events. #Columbus #Shia

Re-Legalization of Slavery (Banned in 1962) in Saudi Arabia?

This is really not surprising considering that both Wahabist ISIS and the Wahabi Saudi Kingdom both like Slavery either today or historically.  This is probably one of the more horrific things I have read about lately...

"Most Islamists prefer to avoid the subject of slavery, which is explicitly permitted in the Koran, but Salafis endorse this practice. Ali Al-Ahmed of the dissident Saudi Information Agency reports today that a prominent Saudi religious authority recently called for slavery to be re-legalized in the kingdom. Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan, the author of a religious textbook (At-Tawhid, "Monotheism") widely used to teach Saudi high school students as well as their counterparts abroad studying in Saudi schools (including those in the West), announced in a recent lecture that "Slavery is a part of Islam. Slavery is part of jihad, and jihad will remain as long there is Islam." He argued against the idea that slavery had ever been abolished, insulting those who espouse this view as "ignorant, not scholars. They are merely writers. Whoever says such things is an infidel."

Read More:

The "Deen for Peen" (Religion for P****) Phenomenon

This is a topic that I think is very important to Women who convert to Islam just because they meet an 'exotic' Muslim Man or Woman overseas or domestically.  I can't begin to explain the number of horror stories I have heard from various individuals.  However, I ran across this list and information on another blog by Daniel Pipes and I think it's very relevant to the problems we see daily.  Unfortunately, many women or men who would otherwise be looked over by attractive men or women here domestically, may be sought after by people who do not have the best of intentions:


Asking for Advice: Readers are requested to offer counsel:

The consular bureau at the U.S. Department of State from the mid-1990s until 2000 distributed a document titled "Marriage to Saudis," offering straight-talking advice to American women contemplating tying the knot with Saudi men. As Martin Kramer describes what he calls "a minor classic by an anonymous diplomat":
It is remarkable for its undiplomatic and anecdotal tone, so distant from the department's standard bureaucratic style. For prospective spouses, "Marriage to Saudis" constituted an official tutorial in Saudi culture; for others, it served as a fascinating example of practical anthropology, school of hard knocks.
Here is a choice excerpt:

The donning of the black abayas and face veils ...
the Saudi-American relationship virtually always blossoms in the States, in a climate that allows dating, cohabitation, children out of wedlock, religious diversity, and a multitude of other Islamic sins which go unnoticed by Saudi relatives and religious leaders thousands of miles away.
American citizen wives swear that the transformation in their Saudi husbands occurs during the transatlantic flight to the Kingdom. There is the universal recollection of approaching Riyadh and witnessing the donning of the black abayas and face veils by the fashionably dressed Saudi women. For many women, the Saudi airport is the first time they see their husband in Arab dress (i.e., the thobe and ghutra). For those American women reluctant to wear an abaya (the all-encompassing black cloak) and for those Saudi husbands who did not make an issue of the abaya prior to arriving, the intense public scrutiny that starts at the airport—given to a western woman who is accompanying a Saudi male—is usually the catalyst for the eventual covering up. Since the overwhelming majority of American citizen wives never travel to the Kingdom prior to their marriage, they are abruptly catapulted into Saudi society.
That document comes to mind in light of the Vatican's release of Erga migrantes caritas Christi ("The Love of Christ Toward Migrants"), an 80-page booklet issued by the Pontifical Council for the Care of Migrants and Itinerant People. Despite its affectionate title, the document includes a warning against Catholic women marrying Muslim men. Here is the key passage:
When, for example, a Catholic woman and a Muslim wish to marry, ... bitter experience teaches us that a particularly careful and in-depth preparation is called for. During it the two fiancés will be helped to know and consciously "assume" the profound cultural and religious differences they will have to face, both between themselves and in relation to their respective families and the Muslim's original environment, to which they may possibly return after a period spent abroad.
If the marriage is registered with a consulate of the Islamic country of origin, the Catholic party must beware of reciting or signing documents containing the shahada (profession of the Muslim belief).
In any case, the marriage between a Catholic and a Muslim, if celebrated in spite of all this, requires not only canonical dispensation but also the support of the Catholic community both before and after the marriage. One of the most important tasks of Catholic associations, volunteer workers and counselling services will be to help these families educate their children and, if need be, to support the least protected member of the Muslim family, that is the woman, to know and insist on her rights.
It's remarkable that, multiculturalism notwithstanding, such institutions as the U.S. government and the Vatican are warning women away from inter-religious marriages. (May 16, 2004)
Dec. 1, 2005 update: Cardinal Camillo Ruini, president of the Italian Bishops Conference and a right-hand man to Pope Benedict XVI, issued a statement yesterday on behalf of the conference, warning against Catholics marrying Muslims. "In addition to the problems that any couple encounters when forming a family, Catholics and Muslims have to reckon with the difficulties that inevitably arise from deep cultural differences." He also noted that it is usually a Catholic woman who marries a Muslim men, that usually she converts, not he, and their children tend to be brought up as Muslims. Further, if an Italian woman marries a Muslim immigrant and they move to his country of origin, her rights are "not guaranteed in the way they are in Italy or in other Western nations." Such marriages, the statement concluded, should therefore be discouraged.
Dec. 26, 2005 updateStephen Fumio Hamao, a Japanese Catholic cardinal, wrote in 2004 about the "bitter experiences" of European women who marry Muslims.
Aug. 23, 2007 update: The Kamil Internaltional Ministries Organization of Raleigh, North Carolina, has published a tract, "Why Women Should Not Marry Muslims?" It begins by contrasting verses from the Koran and New Testament:
  • "Husband, beat your wives and deny them sex." (Koran 4:34)
  • "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the Church and gave Himself for her." (Ephesians 5:25)
It then goes on to offer a stark "Preview":
Because our country receives people of all nationalities, cultures and religions, you may meet and develop a relationship with a Muslim man. He may be especially attractive because of his dark good looks, education, financial means and the interest he shows in you. You may be excited that you have found the 'tall, dark and handsome man' you have been looking for. His sweet words and attention may blind you regarding the influence of his Muslim religion and culture. Because we have freedom of religion, he may agree that you can keep your religion and you may think there will be no problem with such a marriage. Do not be deceived and become a victim of his religion which has very oppressive rules regarding women's status and rights. Such a marriage will cause you great heartache.
The rest of the tract consists of quotations from the Koran and the Hadith, followed by various counsels:
Do not be naive and become a victim. Very often there is a motive behind such a marriage. While you may be in love, a Muslim man could just be using you to obtain legal immigrant status and citizenship. ...
You must be warned that Islam is more than a religion; it is a way of life, a complete code of the 7th Century pagan Arabian culture that Muslims want to force non-Muslims to adopt. If there is ever a dispute between you and your Muslim husband, he only needs to travel to a Muslim country and Islamic law, which favor men, would apply. ...
The Muslim's mind is ingrained with the teachings of the Koran and his Muslim culture which favor men. It does not matter whether he practices Islam or not. ...
Becoming a Muslim's wife would mean you are sacrificing your freedom. ...
If you hope to have a successful married life, consider finding a Christian man. ...
If you are married to a Muslim, never even consider giving up your Lord and Savior Jesus Christ under any situations.
June 25, 2008 update: But not all the advice against intermarriage is directed to non-Muslim women. AKI reports today that, in response to the growing number of Moroccan women who are marrying European men, Sheikh Mohammed al-Tawil of Fez, Morocco insisted in an interview with Al-Arabiya television that marriage between Moroccan women and non-Muslim European men is unacceptable. "This kind of marriage, between Moroccan women and European men, is forbidden by the Koran and the Sunna. A Muslim woman may not marry an unbeliever while a Muslim man may marry Christian and Jewish women."
If the European men convert to Islam, that changes everything, he went on; then, Moroccan women may marry them. "Islam only requires two witnesses for someone to be able to convert and [then] such a marriage is valid." But this is not to be undertaken lightly: "If a European then decides to abandon Islam, Muhammad's words apply to him: those who renounce their own religion must be killed, as they are apostates."
Tawil's position represents classic Shari'a but it contravenes the 2005 reforms of the Mudawana, Morocco's family law, which eased the way for foreigners to marry Moroccan women. Indeed, almost 6,000 such marriages were registered in Morocco in 2007 – about six times as many as a decade earlier and more than the number of Moroccan men who married foreign women that year (which was just over 4,300).
Dec. 1, 2008 update: Asked about mixed marriages, Mariano Crociata, the new secretary-general of the Italian Bishops' Conference, replied that they
are not encouraging, because with the passage of time there is often a return to [the spouses'] cultural, social, religious, and legal origins, with sometimes dramatic consequences, which the children pay for.

Jose Policarpo, head of the Catholic church in Portugal.

Jan. 14, 2009 update: Another cardinal weighs in, this time the head of the Catholic Church in Portugal, Jose Policarpo. He advised Christians to respect Muslims and to learn more about Islam. But he said warned Portuguese women from marrying Muslim men: "Think twice before marrying a Muslim, think very carefully. You can get into a whole lot of trouble, and not even Allah knows where it might end."
July 17, 2011 update: A group called The Organization for Prevention of Assimilation in the Holy Land, going by the abbreviation Lehava, is "defending the daughters of Israel" on the country's beaches. As Yediot Ahronot explains:
According to the organization, many Arab men are posing as Jews, courting and harassing the beautiful women. In response, a "coast guard" aimed at fighting the alleged phenomenon has been set up.
In recent weeks, Lehava members have been handing out dozens of leaflets to Jewish women on the beaches of Bat Yam, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Caesarea and Eilat, asking them to maintain their Jewishness and not to give in to the non-Jewish men's appeals.
The organization decided to do something after receiving complaints from many women who claimed to be harassed by non-Jewish men on the beach. "Last year we discovered that there are many gentiles arriving at the beaches, but not in search of the sun or water," said Benzi Gopstein, one of Lehava's leaders.
"Due to the multiple complaints," he explained, "we decided to promote a campaign at the start of the bathing season this year in order to prevent situations in which girls discover that the 'Yossi' they are dating is actually 'Yusuf', prevent sexual harassment and assimilation.
"The volunteers handing out the leaflets are all seculars, as the religious public only visits segregated beaches, which don't have the Arab problem. We've also started distributing a clip on Facebook and YouTube and we hope the girls will open their eyes. ... We turn to the girls with a plea: 'There are enough good Jewish men you can go out with'."
Aug. 6, 2013 update: This slight blog has over 11,000 comments on it. One sent today, "Learn from my mistakes and do not get involved with a Muslim" by a woman who calls herself "Another Idiot," sums up the consensus of the thousands who have written in:
I would strongly advise to any non-Muslim woman NOT to get involved with a Muslim man. They will NEVER change, no matter how Americanized they seem. Their culture is too ingrained in them. They might want to be Western and they might live a Western lifestyle with their wife but once you have kids EVERYTHING will change.
Nov. 22, 2014 update: For a verse version of the same conclusion, read "Those Egyptian Men" by a woman who lives in Canada.
June 28, 2015 update: Four years later, more news about Lehava (see above, July 17, 2011): It now haunts nightlife venues and hands out to women up to 5,000 sweets a night accompanied by a postcard that says: "My sister, I am thinking about you, I feel you. You have a pure Jewish soul! Don't get lost, don't go with Mahmoud. He'll start by being sweet and then he'll start to beat ... reaching out to help you, Lehava."

Saturday, February 11, 2017

Resisting Islamist Tyranny and Terrorism

The dissenting voices of the oppressed Muslims against Islamism are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own Islamist totalitarian regimes and at the same time by Leftist Western apologists and misguided anti-war stooges for these Islamist tyrants.  As Thomas Jefferson said 'The tree if liberty is fed with blood'.  Also, quoting Winston Churchill..."Never, never, never give up".

This is a personal message to be quoted on all media to Linda Sarsour and her Caliphate Lashgar (Regiment) of so called American Muslim orgs and Leftist allies.

"I would rather pay interest on Loans than to to have my Hands or Head removed in a Sharia State." -Babak Darvish

Islamist Colonization or Immigration?

Immigration or Colonization? US Sees Steep Increase in Immigration from Middle East

Read More:

Linda Sarsour: Islamist Trojan Horse in Women's Movement

  • It must be so convenient, while marching in the safe confines of Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and beaten and violated in their own homes. These women in hijabs marching on Washington do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West," protected from such barbarity.
  • The Western culture that allows women to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just a tool they use to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and imposition of theocratic beliefs.
  • Does Linda Sarsour really think that people have gone so mad that they will give up the civil liberties that their ancestors earned through the centuries, merely for interest-free loans?
  • The hypocrisy is that Sarsour's bold lifestyle in the US portrays that deep down she herself loathes the suppressing conditions that she promotes for the poor women of the Muslim world, who actually have to live with them. Coming from a conservative Muslim society, I know the culture she yearns for would never allow her to launch such activism without permission from her "guardian" men.
  • The dissenting voices of the oppressed are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own totalitarian regimes and at the same time by Western apologists for these tyrants.
Why do women who believe in equal rights for women, pick as their spokesperson someone who one minute boasts of her supposed dissent as "patriotism," while the next minute advocating chopping off other womens' genitals? It is like choosing a hangman to campaign against the death penalty, or the head of ISIS to campaign for same sex marriages.
The principles of "dissent," of which they claim to be so proud, and to have borrowed from religious sources, are actually the modern world's liberal values and human rights -- just those rights values they seem to be trying to destroy.
From the other side of their mouths, however, they are trying to impose Islamic sharia law on the West. Unfortunately, sharia is openly antagonistic to Western values and human rights.
How can cults that believe in dominating others call themselves progressive, when their entire message runs counter to the spirit of tolerance and social coexistence?
The champions of sharia have always said they wish to establish a "righteous" form of government, made by divine law, and presumably to that end, they implant their set of rules -- such as allowing no debate or criticism on their beliefs, or such as segregating sexes -- to destroy modern democracies.
It must be so convenient, while marching on Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and domestically beaten and violated -- and all the while, in the safe confines of Washington, to stay silent on issues of truly massive abuse: floggings; acid burnings; chopping off limbs or heads, or burning, drowning or burying people alive.
These women in hijabs marching on Washington DC do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West', protected from such barbarity.
The values they are enjoying here are the values of the enlightened world and have nothing to do with the culture they are trying to impose on others.
The culture that is allowing women such as Linda Sarsour to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just the culture they are using to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and the imposition of theocratic beliefs through infiltration or force.
The culture to which Sarsour says she aspires, allows mutilating women but does not allow women to speak in a loud tone, let alone speaking through microphones. Hence, she owes her current privileges to her American identity.

Muslim activist Linda Sarsour one minute boasts of her supposed dissent as "patriotism," while the next minute advocates chopping off other womens' genitals. (Image source: Seriously.TV video screenshot)

Sarsour stated in a tweet on May 13, 2015: "You'll know when you're living under Sharia Law if suddenly all your loans & credit cards become interest free. Sound nice, doesn't it?"
Then she wrote on an April 29, 2014 tweet: "@RobertWildiris I don't drink alcohol, don't eat pork, I follow Islamic way of living. That's all Sharia law is."
It would be nice if the only requirements of sharia were avoiding alcohol or pork were; there happens, however, to be an ocean of dos and don'ts that fall into the category of "I follow Islamic way of living."
The ocean Sarsour never bothered to mention, but that the world witnesses every day, exists from the Saudi palaces to the caves of Afghanistan and Raqqa.
The culture that Sarsour desires to impose on the world -- along with promises to waive interest on loans -- does not allow women to interact with unrelated men, drive cars, ride bicycles, attend sports events, leave the house without permission, or wear makeup and clothes that reveal their body parts, let alone address a crowd.
Women would also need four male witnesses to prove a rape, or risk being stoned to death for "adultery."
Does Sarsour really think that people have gone so mad that they will give up all of their civil liberties and freedom that their ancestors earned through the centuries, merely for interest free loans?
The hypocrisy is that her bold lifestyle in the US portrays that deep down, she herself loathes the suppressing conditions that she likes promoting for the poor women of the Muslim world who actually have to live with them.
How would these women in hijabs like to spend a few weeks under the totalitarian regimes about which they love to brag?
Three British girls who followed the call of ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi slipped into Syria to join the jihad, only to be desperate over the mistake they had made; one is believed dead.
Kadiza Sultana, Shamima Begum and Amira Abase, intoxicated by ISIS propaganda, entered Syria to join the holy mission and be ISIS brides.
Sultana reportedly was killed in a Russian airstrike while too scared to try an escape from ISIS, fearing extreme torture and public execution if caught.
The whereabouts of the other two are still unknown, apart from rare contact reported between them and their families.
Sophie Kasiki, a French girl who also managed to break away from the ISIS stronghold in Raqqa with her four-year-old son, said she risked death if caught to try to save her son. She defined the ordeal of being with ISIS as "a journey into a hell from which there seemed no return."
Samra Kesinovic, a 17 year old Austrian girl, was reportedly beaten to death by ISIS fighters when she was caught trying to flee, after being "gifted" by her partner to another ISIS fighter as a sex slave.
The irony is that Linda Sarsour and her followers say they love Hamas and caliphates like the one established by Abu Bakar al-Baghdadi, or Saudi and Iranian regimes -- but of course they do not live in them.
Sarsour has doubtless been put forward by men to promote their soft image as they themselves cannot boast about the rights they are giving to their women.
Coming from a conservative Muslim society, I know the culture she yearns for would never allow her to launch such activism without permission from her "guardian" men.
How come she forgot to mention that in Saudi Arabia and many other Muslim states, her kind of activism would cost a woman her family, her honour and probably her life.
A court in the state of Washington suspended the ban on travelers from seven mainly Muslim countries imposed by the President Trump last week.
Would any judge or influential person dare refute the order of, say, the Saudi King, a sharia council of Iran, a member of a royal family from a Middle Eastern country, a military dictator or the Hamas leaders Sarsour apparently so admires?
You cannot even imagine in your worst nightmares dissenting in those sharia-compliant territories, but yes, dissent is allowed in the US and the West, where people are freely allowed to speak their thoughts.
These are not the values of the alien land she professes to admire; these were fought for and earned by the people of the West with their blood.
The progressives' one-sided love affair with extremists will never serve the purpose of promoting equality.
In fact, it could be counterproductive. In Egypt, the conservative men used women as protestors to overthrow Husni Mubarak's regime, but once the Muslim Brotherhood, which spearheaded the Morsi regime, took control, the whole world watched in shock as they imposed sharia on everyone -- most of all on those women. The Morsi regime later punished women who protested the Iranian-style sharia that it was imposing.
The same imams who were the moving spirits behind Egypt's revolution were then delivering fatwas [religious opinions] to rape the same women who had been marching in the streets for their rights. According to al Arabiyya:
"An Egyptian Salafi preacher, said raping and sexually harassing women protesters in Cairo's Tahrir Square is justified, calling them "crusaders" who "have no shame, no fear and not even feminism.... Abu Islam added that these women activists are going to Tahrir Square not to protest but to be sexually abused because they had wanted to be raped...And by the way, 90 percent of them are crusaders and the remaining 10 percent are widows who have no one to control them.. "
Around 80 women were molested in one night alone, when the Morsi government was ousted and people came out to celebrate his departure.
Those are the views Sarsour is trying to sell.
The same men these liberals and progressives are trying to empower, once enthroned, would declare them apostates and inflict the worst imaginable punishments on them for the "crimes" they are committing by promoting the set of values they think bring harmony in the world.
The dissenting voices of the oppressed are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own totalitarian regimes and at the same time by apologists for these tyrants whom the marchers are empowering -- probably without even realizing what massive harm they are doing.
Khadija Khan is a Pakistan-based journalist and commentator.


Thursday, February 9, 2017

The American Dream & European Christians

Najis Sharia Laws: Biggotry Towards Jews, Christians, and Infidels

Some Muslims talk about "religious biggotry" in relation to Trump's ban on countries with anti-American sentiments. However, how much do American's know about the religious biggotry of Muslims towards non-Muslims?

"107. An infidel i.e. a person who denies Allah or the Day of judgement, or associates anyone else with Allah, is impure. Similarly Ghulat (i.e. those who believe one of the holy twelve Imams to be God or say that God has penetrated into him) and khawarij and Nawasib (i.e. those who are enemies of the holy Imams) are also impure. And similar is the case with one who denies Prophethood or one of the necessities of religion i,e. a thing like prayers, and fasting, which are considered by the Muslims to be a part of the religion of Islam when he knows at thing is a necessity of religion. As regards the people of the Book (i.e. the Jews and the Christians) who do not accept the Prophethood of the last of the Prophet Muhammad bin Abdullah (Peace be upon him and his progeny), they, too, are impure according to well-known narrations and this remark is as a precautionary measure. Hence, it is necessary to avoid them also.

108. The entire body of an infidel and even his hair and nails and all liquid substances of his body are impure.

 This is quite a difficult ruling in the sense that when one socially interacts in a non-muslim country, one will be shaking hands with non-muslims or accidentally brushing against a non-muslim friend's arm, as an example. What does it mean that they are impure: Does it mean I also become impure and must perform wudhu again? Or does it mean if they are wet and they touch me I become impure and must perform wudhu again? If they are impure and they touch something, then that touched object becomes impure right (they may need to be wet to transfer the impurity as previously mentioned)?"

Refugees: Letter From an American Soldier

"Deport them now ! PLEASE READ....From the eyes/experience of a solider - Afghanistan & Iraq. We in the United States know nothing.....
I was asked to share this by the author: I don't typically go on rants or express my political beliefs here, but I just have to get this off my mind. As some of you know, I'm active duty Army. Aside from that, I am a medic. I've spent 3 years of my life overseas in both Afghanistan and Iraq. I've seen some pretty atrocious sites caused by war, from both sides. I've picked up blown up body parts of friends and I've saved the lives of guys who were trying to kill me and my guys right before I was keeping them from their 72 virgins or whatever they believe awaits them on the other side. Here is an unbiased truthful view to the Syrian refugee situation. My first deployment to Iraq, in 2006, my unit voluntarily ran a childrens burn clinic outside of the FOB. It was a constant target for attacks. You would think that people wouldn't shoot mortars or rockets at their own children, but you would be wrong. We saw hundreds of children, from infants to 18 year olds. The overwhelming majority of the kids we saw (90% or better) were clear cases of abuse. These parents were literally dunking their kids in boiling water, or throwing hot chai at their kids faces... Yes, we're talking about babies, toddlers, kids not even old enough to understand why their parents would do these things to them. HUNDREDS of kids... We saw quite a few of these kids that were sexually abused, both girls and boys. Their parents acted if nothing was wrong with this, even when confronted by our doctors. This is the mentality of their society, not the viewpoint of a few individuals... these beliefs have been accepted to the vast majority of these people. Many were educated, well dressed, well spoken men, but yet, they still raped their own children, and kept chai boys (if you don't know what that means, google it.) During that deployment, we also captured the 3rd largest EFP cache that had ever been captured. There were hundreds of copper plates, homemade explosives, fake curbs to house the EFP's, hundreds of mortars and rockets and howitzer rounds, even an anti-aircraft gun. All of these things came from one place, Syria. Almost every single IED or EFP we found or hit could be traced back to Syria... A lot of the terrorists we captured were from SYRIA... Imagine that. Fast forward a couple years, and I find myself in Helmand Province, in Afghanistan... We had a group of Afghani's that were paid to help guard our little mud hut in the middle of an Afghan village (I wasn't on a fob) These guys also kept a "chai boy" A boy, about 11 years old, who was there to serve these guys sexually. We heard him being sexually assaulted many times, but there was nothing we could do about it. We asked the police, the Afghan Army, and we were told the same thing every time.... it's their culture, and accepted as the norm.... Once again, we captured Syrian made explosives, weapons, and other items... We found Syrian passports during raids... And people out there want us to let these people into the US, with our kids, and near our wives. Near our schools, near our churches, synogogues, malls. Places where we should never have to fear being blown up, shot, kidnapped and tortured... Don't forget what they did to the Egyptian Coptic Christians, or the Jordanian pilot... Don't forget about what they do to rape victims! They stone these women to death for being raped! They behead their own people. Do you think they will show mercy to you? Look at the rape statistics in Denmark, Sweden, Belgium. Facts don't lie... 97% of rapes committed in Sweden were committed by Muslim immigrants... And you want 10,000 of these people here? Even if just 1% of these so called "refugees" were ISIS supporters or active ISIS terrorists, would that be acceptable to you? Chew on it... think about it. Take a good look at your kids or your wife and decide if the risk is worth taking. Feel free to share this if you want"

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Why Donald Trump is Targeting H1B Visas and Outsourcing?: Cybersecurity, American Jobs & Salary

For too long foreign companies have raped the American IT Worker blind and created major Cybersecurity weaknesses.


Cybersecurity IT work should never be in the hands of Non-Citizens inside the USA and should never be in the hands of Non-Citizens or Citizens outside the USA. 


We have more than enough unemployed qualified American IT Workers in the USA that can't get jobs and when they do, they don't get paid what they are worth.  


Even if an American IT Worker gets a job, they get half the salary they are worth.  Also, they have a harder time getting full time permanent employment, because they are replaced by H1B workers or those who were former H1B workers that have green cards and citizenships now.  

Sean Spicer Discussing The Protection Ban and President Trump Giving his Weekly Address

President Trump's Press Secretary is discussing the National Security Protection Ban from mostly Muslim countries and a lot more.  President Trump is the only President I know that refused to take a Salary for his job. This means he has sacrificed everything in order to serve and he is being attacked by all our Globalist, Marxist, and Islamist enemies.  If you are on the Left, know that you have made your bed with our enemies.  For those of you who attack him because of his faith or race, know that is racist.  Also, don't forget that this country was founded by White Male Christian Freemasons such as George Washington and crew.  Do you really think that our country would be so amazing if it was an Islamic State?  Communist State? or taken over by Globalist forces? would be an end to our country and freedoms.  For those of you who live in your parents basement, please move out and go into the job market and get a job...notice who you are competing with, who has all the money, and who has the nice cars and houses.  Please pay special attention to the nationality of the personalized license plates.  You may start seeing the big picture.  
President Trumps most recent message...

The Hobbit Factor: Why The Future Does Not Belong To Islamism?

J.R.R. Tolkien’s epic tale the Lord of the Rings is a story about little Hobbits, saving the day in the end. The most powerful enemy within in Tolkien’s story is the wizard Saruman. In the West now, Saruman corresponds to a whole class of people in politics, the leftists, Islamists, media and academia. The Sarumans of the West are met with resistance from thousands of little hobbits in cyberspace, and they don’t like it. Many in the media as well as Muslims want to portray an image that the world is becoming Muslim and that through demographics alone, the world will become Muslim.  This is very possible given the birthrates among Muslims compared to the so called 'Kafir' aka 'Infidel'.  However, something Political Islamists have forgotten is that the impact of globalization and modern mass media is more complicated and has contradictory results.  Rituals are important as brainwashing tools to instill discipline and loyalty. Islam’s focus on rituals remind me of the rituals in the military. But what worked well for a medieval war machine is disastrous for Muslims in the modern world. The Arab war machine was supported by the blind obedience, brotherhood, courage, hatred and high birth rates inspired by Islam in the 7th century. But these same qualities are handicaps for Muslims in the age of computers. Today they lead to poverty, belligerency, war and defeat.  This cycle has actually repeated itself historically as well.  Every established Muslim Dynasty has been wiped out by Fundamentalist Muslims or a resurgence of Christianity.  Islam was perfect for medieval warfare, but gradually lost out to the West, especially after the Scientific and Industrial Revolutions, which could never have taken place in Islamic lands because of their lack of freedom and their cult of authority. Ironically, history has now gone full circle. Muslims are still useless in developing anything new, but as a result of migration, modern communications, the presence of Muslims in 'infidel' lands and Arab oil revenues, they can more readily buy or expropriate technology from others. The Iranian Revolution was aided by audio cassettes of speeches by the Ayatollah Khomeini.  Today's version of cassettes is the Internet, which is one of the main factors that is both working for and against Islam.  Many people have become educated more about Islam and it's Political Islamist sides and have chosen to leave Islamism or Islam altogether.  Islamists try to wear us down through terrorism. They should be worn down through mockery and criticism. We should also make clear that for every Islamic terror attack we will increase these efforts, which Islamists fear more than our weapons. It’s the new balance of terror.