Friday, January 12, 2018

Leftist Neo-Colonialism and Orientalism: Why Rich Leftists Love Islamists

"I feel that we in the West could be helped to rediscover those roots of our own understanding by an appreciation of the Islamic tradition's deep respect for the timeless traditions of the natural order." – Prince Charles

"Where else can you sit down in a single evening and listen to senior people from Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood…?" – John Rees (ex-SWP, now Counterfire/ Stop the War Coalition (StWC), and a regular contributor to Iran's Press TV and the Islam Channel)

Leftist Posh Boys and the Brown Exotic

There is a long tradition of posh Trotskyists/progressives condescending what they take to be the brown exotic. (Prince Charles, who's not a Trot, also indulges in this pastime with all things Islamic and Arabic; just as Sir Richard Francis Burton, another upper-class gentleman, did in the 19th century.)

Since the Left often indulges in what it calls 'class analysis', it can hardly fault me for my class analysis of the thoroughly middle class – and often upper middle class – nature of the Left (or, at least, of the leaders and theorists) over the years.

Since its birth, and into the next few decades, the Central Committee of the Socialist Workers' Party (SWP) was, if anything, more upper middle class than middle class. It certainly wasn't a good example of the plain and much-hated, by Trotskyists, petite bourgeoisie.

In other words, many SWP leaders, both today and in the past, went to public schools and had upper middle class backgrounds. Indeed two current leaders, Alex Callinicos and Charlie Kimber, have upper-class backgrounds.

Let's start with Alexander Theodore Callinicos of the SWP Central Committee.

He's a descendant, through his mother, of the 19th-century Englishman, Lord Acton. His mother was the Hon. Aedgyth Bertha Milburg Mary Antonia Frances Lyon-Dalberg-Acton, the daughter of the 2nd Lord Acton and granddaughter of Lord Acton (the historian). Callinicos himself was educated (colonial style) at a St George's College, a private school in Zimbabwe. He then went on to Balliol College, Oxford.

Then there's 'Charlie' Kimber, a fairly recent arrival to the SWP's Central Committee. Who's he related to? He's related to Sir Henry Kimber, 1st Baronet.

Let's just take two of the more famous Trotskyists for good measure.

Firstly, there's the actress Vanessa Redgrave. She was once a prominent member of the Workers' Revolutionary Party and went so far as to defend its leader, Gerry Healy, when he raped for the revolution (in the manner or Martin Smith - SWP style). More recently, there's Gareth Peirce – the female 'superlawyer' who once freed Abu Qatada.

All these people are so far up the backsides of Muslims, Islamists and the Arabs that they even present 'anti-Zionist' historico-docs (on the Islam Channel and Iran's Press TV) on how uniquely evil Israel is when compared to the sweetness and light of the Sudanese Janjaweed, Boko Haram, the Pakistani Deobandi, and even the Taliban, al-Qaeda and Hamas.

Now take two non-SWP lovers of the brown exotic, Seumas Milne and the 'right wing' Peter Oborne.

Seumas Milne is a columnist and associate editor at The Guardian. He's the younger son of the former BBC Director General Alasdair Milne. He attended Winchester College (a public school) and read Philosophy, Politics and Economics (PPE) at Balliol College, Oxford. (He may have met the SWP's Alex Callinicos there.)

Milne is more Stalinist than Trotskyist. He's always writing in defence of Muslims. Then again, he has also written in defence of Stalinism, the IRA, Saddam Hussein, Mao, China and Pol Pot. Basically, he will defend any individual or group that doesn't remind him too much of his privileged background and the people who crossed him as a kid or when he was growing up at home or at public school. He'll defend anyone – or anything – anti-Establishment in order to cleanse the Establishment from within himself.

Peter Oborne of the Daily Telegraph is perhaps notable for being seen as a conservative defender of all things Islamic and Muslim. He was educated at Sherborne boys' public school and then Christ's College, Cambridge. He too is a perfect positive or inverse neo-colonialist in the tradition of the upper-class Trotskyists of the SWP who also simply adore the brown exotic.

Finally, let's take an Islamophile (or dhimmi) who's a former member of the SWP but only a lowly university professor. Her name is Professor Sue Blackwell. She's the supreme anti-Zionist of the UK. She works at Birmingham University. I've included her because she graphically displays the hypocrisy and condescension of Muslims by posh Trotskyists.

Let me explain all this. In one breath Trots/ SWP/ UAF patronise Muslims. In another they argue, or Marxism does, that Islam, being a religion, is a 'mere epiphenomenon of the socio-economic substructure' devoid of any intrinsic truth or even merit and, in fact, 'deeply illusory' in nature. (Marx's "religion is the opium of the people" and all that.)

Professor Sue Blackwell exemplifies this hypocritical or even schizophrenic approach to Islam/ Muslims. She tells us that she admires Muslims and Islam; but does she also tell these very same Muslims (some of whom are 'her friends') that she thinks Islam 'is a mere epiphenomenon of the socio-economic substructure which underpins it'? Of course she doesn't! Ms Blackwell, being the atheistic materialist that she is (or was?), even goes so far as to say she admires Islam and the Koran itself.

How do Sue Blackwell, the SWP-UAF, etc. sustain this deeply cynical, condescending and opportunistic attitude towards Muslims and Islam?

The Leftists' Positive or Inverted Racism

I use the term 'neo-colonialist' for two reasons.

One: most of those who have led leftist/ Trotskyist groups – the ones who formulated their policies and wrote their doctrines – have backgrounds not dissimilar to those of the colonialist rulers of the British Empire.

Two: these people, and their student-automaton followers, have resurrected colonialism and Orientalism.

Instead of talking about 'foreign Johnnies' or 'the white man's burden', they invert these sentiments and patronise and adore the brown exotics. It is exactly the kind of racist and colonialist mindset they are supposed to be against. However, it is inverted or irredeemably positive. In other words, they patronise Muslims rather than belittle them. (Interestingly enough, the prime contention of Edward Said's Occidentalist book, Orientalism, was not only that Western Orientalists and colonialists belittled and dismissed Arabs and Muslims, but also that they romanticised and idealized them.)

Both the original colonialists and our own leftist neo-colonialists treated and treat Muslims as children. Colonialists of the old school were said to have treated Muslims as (bad) children who often ought to be punished. In leftist neo-colonialism, Muslims are treated as children who must never be punished because they are never responsible for anything they do (even if they blow kuffar children up).

There is a lot of evidence that Muslims, especially hard-core Islamists, are aware of being patronised by the Left. However, because this is a tawdry affair of mutual use, that doesn't really matter to them.

The Trots are attempting "to tap into the revolutionary potential of Muslims" (the words of John Molyneux, formerly of the SWP); and Islamists are grateful for any help they can get in their goal of Islamising Britain.

So Leftists are doing a great job for Muslim extremists. But will Muslim extremists one day return the favour by becoming Marxist revolutionaries? Not a chance in hell!

The Marxist/ Trotskyist Theories Underneath It All

SWP/ UAF/ Trotskyists/ progressives will never uncover Muslim wrong or even speak about it. Instead they concentrate entirely on white 'Zionists', white Western leaders, capitalism and the white (non-Leftist) working class of the UK – that terrible bugbear of London dinner parties, the very same class formerly despised by those ultra-posh leftist advocates of eugenics for the working class, the Fabians.

No Muslim can ever do wrong in the middle class Trotskyist's eyes; just as brown and black people cannot, by Marxist stipulation, be racist.

The Left's racism is inverted or positive. (Yes, but need I say 'inverted'?) Brown and black people can never do wrong – only EDL 'chavs' and 'knuckle-draggers' can do wrong. (They say 'EDL' when they nearly always mean the white working class as a whole; save the leftist ones.) Trotskyists/progressives believe that Muslims – because they are an 'oppressed' minority – can never do wrong.

Yet Trotskyists or progressives can be as against religion as anyone. Well, they are as against Christianity as anyone, because Christianity is a 'white oppressor religion'.

At the heart of this is the hatred of many Leftists of their own country and the Sins of Their Fathers, as well as of their own class and their own civilisation. And that's one reason why most of them take such a soft position on Muslims and Islam. Muslims, in the present period of history, are seen by them to be the main enemy of Western civilisation; just as Nicaragua formerly occupied that position; and before that, North Vietnam; and before that, Cuba; and before that, China; and before that, the Soviet Union.

These people are still rebelling against a Western imperialism which only existed many, many years ago. And that imperialism was led by people who weren't that unlike their own grandparents, great-grandparents, etc. Thus they must embrace the brown exotic.

Leftists are indirectly arguing that Muslims are incapable of acting morally; of acting with free will and conscience; and of being adult human beings. They argue that because they are brown and Muslim, they can do things which they would never allow a white person to do.

For God's sake, how pure do you want your racism to be?"

Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Islamo-Leftism Defined

French philosopher Pascal Bruckner understands Islamo-Leftism as "the fusion between the atheist Far Left and religious radicalism."  According to Bruckner, Islamo-Leftism was "chiefly" conceived by British Trotskyites of the Socialist Workers Party. Because these dedicated Leftists perceive Islam's potential for fomenting societal unrest, they promote tactical, temporary alliances with reactionary Muslim parties. According to Bruckner, Leftist adherents of Third-Worldism hope to use Islamism as a "battering-ram" to bring about the downfall of free-market capitalism, and they see the sacrifice of individual rights - in particular, of women's rights - as an acceptable trade-off in service of the greater goal of destroying capitalism. Bruckner contends that Islamists, for their part, pretend to join the left in its opposition to racism, neocolonialism, and globalization as a tactical and temporary means to achieve their true goal of imposing the "totalitarian theocracy" of Islamist government.

Political scientist Maurice Fraser regards Islamo-Leftism as part of a, "striking and recent abdication of the Enlightenment project of human rights, freedom, secularism, science and progress," on the part of the political left, particularly among the anti-globalization activists of the New Left.

Bernard-Henri Lévy has described "Islamo-leftism" as, "this grand new alliance between the reds and the new browns, of the axis which runs from Le Monde diplomatique to the death squads," and as a sort of "anti-American religion."

According to Mark Silinsky of the United States Army War College, Islamo-Leftism is alliance of Islamists and leftists in opposition to Western values that can also be also referred to as the "red-green axis." Silinsky characterizes the black-green alliance between Black Lives Matter and the Council on American–Islamic Relations as an example of Islamo-Leftism.

According to Robert S. Wistrich, "A poisonous anti-Jewish legacy can be found in Marx, Fourier, and Proudhon, extending through the orthodox Communists and “non-conformist” Trotskyists to the Islamo-Leftist hybrids of today who... (are allied with) the Islamist anti-Semites of Hamas.

Alvin Hirsch Rosenfeld describes Islamo Leftism as, "the hope, entertained by a revolutionary fringe, of seeing Islam become the spearhead of a new insurrection, engaged in a 'Holy War against global capitalism."

Abū Dharr al-Ghifārī, a companion of Muhammad, is credited by some scholars, like Muhammad Sharqawi and Sami Ayad Hanna, as a principal antecedent of Islamic socialism.  He protested against the accumulation of wealth by the ruling class during Uthman's caliphate and urged the equitable redistribution of wealth. The first Muslim Caliph Abu Bakr introduced a guaranteed minimum standard of income, granting each man, woman and child ten dirhams annually—this was later increased to twenty dirhams.

The first experimental Islamic commune was established during the Russian Revolution of 1917 as part of the Wäisi movement, an early supporter of the Soviet government. The Muslim Socialist Committee of Kazan was also active at this time.

In the modern era, Islamic socialism can be divided into two: a leftist and a rightist form. The leftist (Siad Barre, Haji Misbach, Ali Shariati, Yasser Arafat and Jalal Al-e Ahmad) advocated secular proletarian internationalism and encouraged Muslims to join or collaborate with international socialist or Marxist movements. Right-wing socialists (Mohammed Iqbal, Agus Salim, Jamal ad-Din Asad-Abadi, Musa al-Sadr and Mahmud Shaltut) are ideologically closer to third positionism, supporting not just social justice, egalitarian society and universal equality, but also Islamic revivalism and implementation of Sharia. They also reject a full adoption of a class struggle and keep a distance from other socialist movements.

Revolutionary activity along the Soviet Union's southern border and Soviet decision makers recognized would draw the attention of capitalist powers and invite them to intervene. It was this understanding which prompted the Russian representation at the Baku Congress in September 1920 to reject the arguments of the national communists as impractical and counterproductive to the revolution in general, without elaborating their fear that the safety of Russia lay in the balance. It was this understanding, coupled with the Russian Bolsheviks' displeasure at seeing another revolutionary center proposed in their own domain revolutionary, that galvanized them into action against the national communists.

Muhammed Nakhshab is credited with the first synthesis between Shi'ism and European socialism. Nakhshab's movement was based on the tenet that Islam and socialism were not incompatible since both sought to accomplish social equality and justice. His theories had been expressed in his B.A. thesis on the laws of ethics. In 1943, Nakhshab founded the Movement of God-Worshipping Socialists, one of six original member organizations of the National Front. The organization was founded through the merger of two groupings, Nakhshab's circle of high school students at Dar al-Fanoun and Jalaleddin Ashtiyani's circle of about 25 students at the Faculty of Engineering at Tehran University. The organization was initially known as League of Patriotic Muslims. It combined religious sentiments, nationalism and socialist thoughts.






Friday, January 5, 2018

Secular Muslim Perspective: Truly, Where are The Moderate Muslims?

Secular Muslim Perspective: Truly, Where are The Moderate Muslims?

Iran is Ripe for a Nationalist Revolution: HNG Lord Babak Khan Darvish


Iran is Ripe for a Nationalist Revolution 

The Past...1979

After The Iranian Revolution of 1979, The new religious and theocratic Government put all the emphasis on Islam and declared that those who consider themselves Nationalists are traitors to Islam (The Same way that Islamists say that there is Death for Murtad/Apostates). Following this ideology, The Islamist government tried to eliminate any group, party or individuals who were considered a threat to Islamic Government.

It is important to know that those who were involved in the revolution were from all strata of Iranian society including the Nationalists, workers, teachers, business groups, communists, religious fanatics, etc. However, the combined communists and religious members which at the time of the revolution they were called "Marxist Islamists" including members of Tudeh party, a confederation of communists, Mujahidin Khalgh were the most organized and they thought if they overthrow the Shah and created an Islamic Republic, it would be easy to eliminate a bunch of Clerics. This was a huge miscalculation. Because, the Islamic republic government began to create Basij groups, Sepah Pasdaran, Hezbollah, and in addition train almost half a million clerics to use them against the Iranian people at any point in time.

As soon as the Islamic Republic of Iran was established, the authorities began to execute top military generals, powerful civilians who were rich by calling them Taqhuti. In fact a representative of Ayatollah Khomeini came to my grandfather, HNG Lord Jaffar Khan Darvish in Vanush and gave him a list of 5000 people and asked him to eliminate those people. The list included all the rich, powerful and influential members of the major families in Mazandaran. 

My grandfather told the representative of the government that he could not go around and kill his people and that as a commander of The Nationalist Resistance Freedom Fighters (NRFF) he and his groups were trained to resist against our northern enemy of the time, The Soviet Union (Russians) and that we would fight the Communist Russians if they try to invade Mazandaran, but we could not kill our own brothers. 

The representative of Islamic Government, then, told my grandfather, that “Mr. Jaffar Khan” you have two choices. Either you are with us or against us. Decide fast, we will get back with you later. By the way the Representative of the Government brought a big truck loaded with arms and ammunitions as well as a very large suitcase full of money to give to my grandfather which he did not accept.

My father and all uncles were present in that setting and witnessed the incident. My father told my grandfather that The Islamic Government would not leave you alone from this point in time to your rejection of their offers of killing people they wished to get rid of according to the list they presented. My father also told my grandfather and uncles that from now on, The Islamic Republic of Iran would do anything in their power, to harass you, arrest you or imprison you so be careful not to give them any excuses.

This visit by the representative of the Islamic Republic occurred during 1980.
It was during 1981, that Iranian Government arrested my two uncles Shoja Khan and Esfandiar Khan and later they arrested my grandfather Jaffar Khan. 

They tortured and killed my younger uncle Shoja Khan and the nature of the torture was in a way that they did not want my grand-father and grand-mother see my uncle’s body. They buried him in the grave and only provided the grave number to my grand-parents. After torturing my grandfather and older uncle Esfandiar for almost six years, they released them from the political prison almost half dead.

In general my family were not the only victims of Islamic Republic of Iran. They imprisoned thousands of innocent young and old people of Iran, tortured them and executed them without any major trial. They raped many young men and women in political prisons and there are thousands of witnesses who could attest to these criminal evil activities.

The Present Time...2018

Iran is ripe to explode as we are reaching to the climax and the boiling point of Iranian society. Sociology as a science tells us that when society reaches to is boiling point and people are completely frustrated and angry as related to unemployment, poverty, hunger, injustice, lack of morality among government officials, hypocrisy, pretense, false promises, and government officials stealing money from people and their natural resources and taking the money for themselves or spending it for many foreign countries who are enemy of the Iranian people by justifying it that we are all Muslims.

Communist and Muslim extremists became united due to common values they have such as: No borders, socialism, considering nationalism as something very evil, not paying attention to the Iranian Civilization, history, culture, monarchies, etc.

At this point people of Iran who have suffered for almost forty years under the dictatorship of a theocratic government without getting their political, social, economic and even simple human right and are all poor and hungry, not able to buy a house or even rent a an apartment or pay for their utilities and more than anything else they are not able to support their families and can’t even afford their food, reached to a boiling point that they do not care about their life and do not have anything to loose except the chains that are around their hands and legs.

Bottom line: Iran is ready for a new Democratic Revolution but a Nationalistic one.



IRAN IS RIPE FOR A REVOLUTION: HNG Lord Babak Darvish (Babak Khan) Discussing The Iranian Rebel Alliance on "BBC Outside Source" - Friday, January 5th, 2018 @ 15:00 GMT


BBC OUTSIDE SOURCE INTERVIEW FRIDAY, JANUARY 5TH @ 15:00GMT 

The Past...

After The Iranian Revolution of 1979, The new religious and theocratic Government put all the emphasis on Islam and declared that those who consider themselves Nationalists are traitors to Islam (The Same way that Islamists say that there is Death for Murtad/Apostates). Following this ideology, The Islamist government tried to eliminate any group, party or individuals who was considered a threat to Islamic Government.

It is important to know that those who were involved in the revolution were from all strata of Iranian society including the Nationalists, workers, teachers, business groups, communists, religious fanatics, etc. However, the combined communists and religious members which at the time of the revolution they were called "Marxist Islamists" including members of Tudeh party, a confederation of communists, Mujahidin Khalgh were the most organized and they thought if they overthrow the Shah and created an Islamic Republic, it would be easy to eliminate a bunch of Clerics. This was a huge miscalculation. Because, the Islamic republic government began to create Basij groups, Sepah Pasdaran, Hezbollah, and in addition train almost half a million clerics to use them against the Iranian people at any point in time.

As soon as the Islamic Republic of Iran was established, the authorities began to execute top military generals, powerful civilians who were rich by calling them Taqhuti. In fact a representative of Ayatollah Khomeini came to my grandfather, HNG Lord Jaffar Khan Darvish in Vanush and gave him a list of 5000 people and asked him to eliminate those people. The list included all the rich, powerful and influential members of the major families in Mazandaran. 

My grandfather told the representative of the government that he could not go around and kill his people and that as a commander of The Nationalist Resistance Freedom Fighters (NRFF) he and his groups were trained to resist against our northern enemy of the time, The Soviet Union (Russians) and that we would fight the Communist Russians if they try to invade Mazandaran, but we could not kill our own brothers. 

The representative of Islamic Government, then, told my grandfather, that “Mr. Jaffar Khan” you have two choices. Either you are with us or against us. Decide fast, we will get back with you later. By the way the Representative of the Government brought a big truck loaded with arms and ammunitions as well as a very large suitcase full of money to give to my grandfather which he did not accept.

My father and all uncles were present in that setting and witnessed the incident. My father told my grandfather that The Islamic Government would not leave you alone from this point in time to your rejection of their offers of killing people they wished to get rid of according to the list they presented. My father also told my grandfather and uncles that from now on, The Islamic Republic of Iran would do anything in their power, to harass you, arrest you or imprison you so be careful not to give them any excuses.

This visit by the representative of the Islamic Republic occurred during 1980.
It was during 1981, that Iranian Government arrested my two uncles Shjoja Khan and Esfandiar Khan and later they arrested my grandfather Jaffar Khan. 

They tortured and killed my younger uncle Shoja Khan and the nature of the torture was in a way that they did not want my grand-father and grand-mother see my uncle’s body. They buried him in the grave and only provided the grave number to my grand-parents. After torturing my grandfather and older uncle Esfandiar for almost six years, they released them from the political prison almost half dead.

In general my family were not the only victims of Islamic Republic of Iran. They imprisoned thousands of innocent young and old people of Iran, tortured them and executed them without any major trial. They raped many young men and women in political prisons and there are thousands of witnesses who could attest to these criminal evil activities.

The Present Time...2018

Iran is ripe to explode as we are reaching to the climax and the boiling point of Iranian society. Sociology as a science tells us that when society reaches to is boiling point and people are completely frustrated and angry as related to unemployment, poverty, hunger, injustice, lack of morality among government officials, hypocrisy, pretense, false promises, and government officials stealing money from people and their natural resources and taking the money for themselves or spending it for many foreign countries who are enemy of the Iranian people by justifying it that we are all Muslims.

Communist and Muslim extremists became united due to common values they have such as: No borders, socialism, considering nationalism as something very evil, not paying attention to the Iranian Civilization, history, culture, monarchies, etc.

At this point people of Iran who have suffered for almost forty years under the dictatorship of a theocratic government without getting their political, social, economic and even simple human right and are all poor and hungry, not able to buy a house or even rent a an apartment or pay for their utilities and more than anything else they are not able to support their families and can’t even afford their food, reached to a boiling point that they do not care about their life and do not have anything to loose except the chains that are around their hands and legs.

Bottom line: Iran is ready for a new democratic revolution but a nationalistic one.


Thursday, January 4, 2018

My "BBC Outside Source" Talking Points: Iran is Ripe for a New Revolution


BBC OUTSIDE SOURCE INTERVIEW FRIDAY, JANUARY 5TH @ 15:00GMT 

The Past...

After The Iranian Revolution of 1979, The new religious and theocratic Government put all the emphasis on Islam and declared that those who consider themselves Nationalists are traitors to Islam (The Same way that Islamists say that there is Death for Murtad/Apostates). Following this ideology, The Islamist government tried to eliminate any group, party or individuals who was considered a threat to Islamic Government.

It is important to know that those who were involved in the revolution were from all strata of Iranian society including the Nationalists, workers, teachers, business groups, communists, religious fanatics, etc. However, the combined communists and religious members which at the time of the revolution they were called "Marxist Islamists" including members of Tudeh party, a confederation of communists, Mujahidin Khalgh were the most organized and they thought if they overthrow the Shah and created an Islamic Republic, it would be easy to eliminate a bunch of Clerics. This was a huge miscalculation. Because, the Islamic republic government began to create Basij groups, Sepah Pasdaran, Hezbollah, and in addition train almost half a million clerics to use them against the Iranian people at any point in time.

As soon as the Islamic Republic of Iran was established, the authorities began to execute top military generals, powerful civilians who were rich by calling them Taqhuti. In fact a representative of Ayatollah Khomeini came to my grandfather, HNG Lord Jaffar Khan Darvish in Vanush and gave him a list of 5000 people and asked him to eliminate those people. The list included all the rich, powerful and influential members of the major families in Mazandaran. 

My grandfather told the representative of the government that he could not go around and kill his people and that as a commander of The Nationalist Resistance Freedom Fighters (NRFF) he and his groups were trained to resist against our northern enemy of the time, The Soviet Union (Russians) and that we would fight the Communist Russians if they try to invade Mazandaran, but we could not kill our own brothers. 

The representative of Islamic Government, then, told my grandfather, that “Mr. Jaffar Khan” you have two choices. Either you are with us or against us. Decide fast, we will get back with you later. By the way the Representative of the Government brought a big truck loaded with arms and ammunitions as well as a very large suitcase full of money to give to my grandfather which he did not accept.

My father and all uncles were present in that setting and witnessed the incident. My father told my grandfather that The Islamic Government would not leave you alone from this point in time to your rejection of their offers of killing people they wished to get rid of according to the list they presented. My father also told my grandfather and uncles that from now on, The Islamic Republic of Iran would do anything in their power, to harass you, arrest you or imprison you so be careful not to give them any excuses.

This visit by the representative of the Islamic Republic occurred during 1980.
It was during 1981, that Iranian Government arrested my two uncles Shjoja Khan and Esfandiar Khan and later they arrested my grandfather Jaffar Khan. 

They tortured and killed my younger uncle Shoja Khan and the nature of the torture was in a way that they did not want my grand-father and grand-mother see my uncle’s body. They buried him in the grave and only provided the grave number to my grand-parents. After torturing my grandfather and older uncle Esfandiar for almost six years, they released them from the political prison almost half dead.

In general my family were not the only victims of Islamic Republic of Iran. They imprisoned thousands of innocent young and old people of Iran, tortured them and executed them without any major trial. They raped many young men and women in political prisons and there are thousands of witnesses who could attest to these criminal evil activities.

The Present Time...2018

Iran is ripe to explode as we are reaching to the climax and the boiling point of Iranian society. Sociology as a science tells us that when society reaches to is boiling point and people are completely frustrated and angry as related to unemployment, poverty, hunger, injustice, lack of morality among government officials, hypocrisy, pretense, false promises, and government officials stealing money from people and their natural resources and taking the money for themselves or spending it for many foreign countries who are enemy of the Iranian people by justifying it that we are all Muslims.

Communist and Muslim extremists became united due to common values they have such as: No borders, socialism, considering nationalism as something very evil, not paying attention to the Iranian Civilization, history, culture, monarchies, etc.

At this point people of Iran who have suffered for almost forty years under the dictatorship of a theocratic government without getting their political, social, economic and even simple human right and are all poor and hungry, not able to buy a house or even rent a an apartment or pay for their utilities and more than anything else they are not able to support their families and can’t even afford their food, reached to a boiling point that they do not care about their life and do not have anything to loose except the chains that are around their hands and legs.

Bottom line: Iran is ready for a new democratic revolution but a nationalistic one.